This article didn’t try to articulate the failure of system (administration) to produce the Hema Committee report at the right time and also the political turmoil behinds it… where is the missing pages (report)? What action govt. will take? Actually here delivered one dimensional perception.
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. You’ve raised important questions about the administrative delays, political turmoil, and the incomplete release of the Hema Committee Report. While these are indeed significant aspects of the broader issue, my article focused specifically on the gender dynamics, power structures, and the marginalisation of workplace rights within the Malayalam film industry, as highlighted by the report. My aim was to shed light on the systemic issues affecting women in the industry, rather than delve into the administrative and political aspects surrounding the report's release. It's important to note that this is an article, not a 300-page research thesis. Naturally, it can't cover every dimension of the topic in a single piece. As a research scholar yourself, I’m sure you understand the necessity of focusing on specific themes within the scope of an article. That said, your points are well taken and could be explored further in future work. I appreciate your engagement and insights.
(1) Significance to address gender dynamics, power structures, and the marginalisation of workplace through the execution level, indeed the moderating variable, if the prominent stakeholder is moderating here, Your three dimensions doesn’t correlate the moderating variables in this context, then how we will expects a fruitful outcome
(2) Lol! ‘ not a 300-page research thesis’ denotes a zero tolerance level😅, but whatever 300 page thesis a default setting, Nowadays IIM’s and Western universities produce just 100 page thesis.
Regarding your first point, I understand your concern about the correlation between the dimensions I discussed and the moderating variables, such as the role of prominent stakeholders. The focus of my article was to highlight how gender dynamics, power structures, and workplace marginalization operate within the context of the Malayalam film industry, as highlighted by the Hema Committee Report. While I didn't delve into the execution level and its impact as a moderating variable in this piece, I agree that it’s an important factor to consider for a holistic understanding. However, the article was intentionally scoped to provide a critical examination of the issues at a more thematic level rather than a detailed operational analysis.
On your second point, my reference to the "300-page thesis" was meant to emphasize the limitations of what can be covered in a single article, rather than to dismiss the validity of shorter theses or research works. I recognize that academic norms are evolving, and I certainly didn't mean to imply that longer work is inherently more valuable. My intention was to highlight that, in a short-form article, it's necessary to focus on specific aspects rather than attempt to cover all possible dimensions of a complex issue.
This article didn’t try to articulate the failure of system (administration) to produce the Hema Committee report at the right time and also the political turmoil behinds it… where is the missing pages (report)? What action govt. will take? Actually here delivered one dimensional perception.
Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. You’ve raised important questions about the administrative delays, political turmoil, and the incomplete release of the Hema Committee Report. While these are indeed significant aspects of the broader issue, my article focused specifically on the gender dynamics, power structures, and the marginalisation of workplace rights within the Malayalam film industry, as highlighted by the report. My aim was to shed light on the systemic issues affecting women in the industry, rather than delve into the administrative and political aspects surrounding the report's release. It's important to note that this is an article, not a 300-page research thesis. Naturally, it can't cover every dimension of the topic in a single piece. As a research scholar yourself, I’m sure you understand the necessity of focusing on specific themes within the scope of an article. That said, your points are well taken and could be explored further in future work. I appreciate your engagement and insights.
(1) Significance to address gender dynamics, power structures, and the marginalisation of workplace through the execution level, indeed the moderating variable, if the prominent stakeholder is moderating here, Your three dimensions doesn’t correlate the moderating variables in this context, then how we will expects a fruitful outcome
(2) Lol! ‘ not a 300-page research thesis’ denotes a zero tolerance level😅, but whatever 300 page thesis a default setting, Nowadays IIM’s and Western universities produce just 100 page thesis.
Regarding your first point, I understand your concern about the correlation between the dimensions I discussed and the moderating variables, such as the role of prominent stakeholders. The focus of my article was to highlight how gender dynamics, power structures, and workplace marginalization operate within the context of the Malayalam film industry, as highlighted by the Hema Committee Report. While I didn't delve into the execution level and its impact as a moderating variable in this piece, I agree that it’s an important factor to consider for a holistic understanding. However, the article was intentionally scoped to provide a critical examination of the issues at a more thematic level rather than a detailed operational analysis.
On your second point, my reference to the "300-page thesis" was meant to emphasize the limitations of what can be covered in a single article, rather than to dismiss the validity of shorter theses or research works. I recognize that academic norms are evolving, and I certainly didn't mean to imply that longer work is inherently more valuable. My intention was to highlight that, in a short-form article, it's necessary to focus on specific aspects rather than attempt to cover all possible dimensions of a complex issue.